🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a corporate feel, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address white audiences about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The tide has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament gains confidence to say that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month represents how little it can be effective if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just discontinue things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an time that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it ignores the present reality of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the passive language of implicit prejudice and awareness of minor insults, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if anti-racism is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an total re-identification is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.